CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates
From: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:20:17 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

That is interesting Yan.  Maybe the false QSLs are to get a more rare call.  
Some report that they get lots of false calls--many complaints from the 
W-region!  I have never received any false QSLs in over 3000 contacts, although 
I have gotten a few broken ones that listed me as AA0AA and not XE1/AA0AA.

Scott


>________________________________
> From: XV4Y (Yan) <xv4y@nature-mekong.com>
>To: cq-contest@contesting.com 
>Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 5:08 PM
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates
> 
>
>Hi Dale,
>
>Well, DXKeeper is free and has a very good integration with LotW.
>I use N1MM for actually logging the QSOs at my operating position, but 
>transfer them to DXKeeper for all the "log managing" and QSLing.
>
>I have 193 confirmed countries with LotW for 223 worked. Only CW and SSB, 
>really few DIGI.
>I was more than surprised of that confirmation rate, but it I confirm you 
>receive more confirmation from contesters and CWers than from SSB DXers...
>I don't look at eQSL anymore as I receive far to more fake QSO requests.
>
>73,
>Yan.
>---
>Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y
>http://xv4y.radioclub.asia/
>http://varc.radioclub.asia/
>
>Le 13 févr. 2014 à 00:00, cq-contest-request@contesting.com a écrit :
>
>> Message: 6
>> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:29:05 -0700
>> From: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
>> To: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>,
>>     "cq-contest@contesting.com"    <cq-contest@contesting.com>,
>>     "rtty@contesting.com" <rtty@contesting.com>
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates
>> Message-ID: <COL127-W36E6CFB6095EB3A0AAAB46D0920@phx.gbl>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>> 
>> My Winlog32 does the eQSL thing automatically.. it does NOT do LOTW auto.. 
>> far from it.IN FACT.. I have not been successful with LOTW in well over two 
>> years. IF winlog32 or any logging program.. like N1MM would do the LOTW 
>> auto.. I'd be plumb happy...and so would a whole lotta other folk too. (the 
>> ones that need a WY confirmation).
>> 
>> Have a great day, 
>> 
>> 
>> --...   ...--
>> Dale - WC7S in Wy
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>