Hi Martin,
Your opinion has some logic, indeed.
Respecting different opinions, I just want to ask German friends to
reconsider and discuss sensitive and important part of rules. That's
all, and their decision in anyhow final.
73
Ranko
On 5/29/2015 12:13 AM, Martin , LU5DX wrote:
I don't think anything's flawed.
WRTC is about top contesters.
You cannot prove you are a top contester if you are part of a crew.
You can only prove you are a top contester by being succesful in SOAB
categories.
That's totally separated from the competition mode adopted by each
WRTC: MS or M2 or whatever.
Those who have proved they are good in SOAB will also have to prove
they are good when it comes to team work.
It doesn't work the other way around.
73,
Martin LU5DX
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:21 PM, VK4TS Trent Sampson
<vk4ts@outlook.com <mailto:vk4ts@outlook.com>> wrote:
Agreed Ranko,
A scoring system that favours Single ops to compete in a Multi Op
contest
(WRTC) and disadvantages those who operate Multi Ops obviously has
major
flaws -
Considering the format was M2 from the last WRTC it is even
further flawed.
Regards
Trent VK4TS
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
<mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com>] On Behalf Of
4O3A
Sent: Friday, 29 May 2015 2:13 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 qualifications
Once more I would like to ask our German friends to reconsider two
important
parts of rules:
1. Qualification period. It is really too short. Needless to repeat
reasons why it should be longer.
2. Weight for categories - to correct MS weight from 0.9 to 1.0, as
it was earlier. As majority of active contest stations will try to
qualify
for WRTC, this will "disqualify" MS for next two years. If it
won't be
changed, or WRTC qualification or MS participation in next two
years must
be sacrificed.
I know it is hard/impossible to make everything to be ideal, and
will not
impress my personal opinion about other details I disagree, but
those two
are "infrastructural" :-)
73
Ranko
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2014.0.4800 / Virus Database: 4311/9888 - Release Date: 05/28/15
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|