CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Claiming assistance when not actually assisted

To: "Tim Shoppa" <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Claiming assistance when not actually assisted
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 13:50:15 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
While we're at it we could eliminate the distinction between boys and girls, 
the distinction between sweet and sour, and the distinction between east and 
west.


No, wait a minute those things are different from each other.  Combining them 
is a ludicrous notion.





Well, so are assisted and not-assisted different from each other, and combining 
them in a single category is a ludicrous notion also.






__73, de Hans, K0HB

"Just a Boy and His Radio"™




On Friday, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:53, Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>, wrote:

At this point I might start asking why not eliminate the distinction

between assisted and unassisted, and allow assistance for everyone?
_______________________________________________

CQ-Contest mailing list

CQ-Contest@contesting.com

http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>