I can't be both a boy and a girl at the same time. Something can't be
both sweet and sour at the same time. East and west never meet.
But I CAN qualify equally for assisted and non-assisted by doing EXACTLY
the same thing per the rules in either case. If I can legally choose to
enter either category without doing anything different, why can't I
qualify for both? Calling that ludicrous seems ludicrous to me.
Dave AB7E
On 12/4/2015 2:50 PM, Radio K0HB wrote:
While we're at it we could eliminate the distinction between boys and girls,
the distinction between sweet and sour, and the distinction between east and
west.
No, wait a minute those things are different from each other. Combining them
is a ludicrous notion.
Well, so are assisted and not-assisted different from each other, and combining
them in a single category is a ludicrous notion also.
__73, de Hans, K0HB
"Just a Boy and His Radio"™
On Friday, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:53, Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>, wrote:
At this point I might start asking why not eliminate the distinction
between assisted and unassisted, and allow assistance for everyone?
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|