Hans,
As Finns say, kamoon . . it is like come on.
Please review the rules.
For example in SAC you can be assisted if you operate un-assisted.
But you cannot operate un-assisted if you operate using assistance.
73,
Jukka OH6LI
2015-12-05 18:51 GMT+02:00 Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>:
> If I use assistance I am not able to qualify as not-assisted. And
> vice-versa, if I am not-assisted then I obviously am not assisted.
> Mutually exclusive. East and west.
>
>
>
> __73, de Hans, K0HB
>
> "Just a Boy and His Radio"™
>
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:26 AM, David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I can't be both a boy and a girl at the same time. Something can't be
> > both sweet and sour at the same time. East and west never meet.
> > But I CAN qualify equally for assisted and non-assisted by doing EXACTLY
> > the same thing per the rules in either case. If I can legally choose to
> > enter either category without doing anything different, why can't I
> > qualify for both? Calling that ludicrous seems ludicrous to me.
> > Dave AB7E
> > On 12/4/2015 2:50 PM, Radio K0HB wrote:
> >> While we're at it we could eliminate the distinction between boys and
> girls, the distinction between sweet and sour, and the distinction between
> east and west.
> >>
> >>
> >> No, wait a minute those things are different from each other.
> Combining them is a ludicrous notion.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Well, so are assisted and not-assisted different from each other, and
> combining them in a single category is a ludicrous notion also.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> __73, de Hans, K0HB
> >>
> >> "Just a Boy and His Radio"™
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Friday, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:53, Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>, wrote:
> >>
> >> At this point I might start asking why not eliminate the distinction
> >>
> >> between assisted and unassisted, and allow assistance for everyone?
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>
> >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >>
> >> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >>
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|