[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Category hopping

To: "'Michael Schulz'" <mschulz@creative-chaos.com>, "'Martin , LU5DX'" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>, "'Maarten van Rossum'" <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Category hopping
From: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:40:03 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Martin why are you calling unenforceable rules loop holes?  I see them as
two different groups.

I wasn't born in Saskatchewan, but I got here as soon as I could.

-----Original Message----

Don?t confuse loopholes with rule breaking.

Mike K5TRI

-----Original Message-----

Wow Maarten,
What you say is really dangerous.
There are loopholes everywhere in the rules.
Rules require you to use certain level of output power to enter a category,
but there is a loophlole, since no one is going to be able to verify that,
according to your reasoning we are supossed to use whatever power level we
want and then take advantage of the loophole to win a plaque?

Rules requiere a person to do all the logging and operating to be considered
a single OP, but, there is a loophole since no one is going to be at your
place to verify that. Is that mean, we must Take advantage of the loophole
and use the seevices of a ghost OP, so that we can confortable sleep at
night, and still claim single OP to gain the upper hand?

There are a few things that resolve loopholes of any kind: dignity, respect
and sportsmanship.

Martín LU5DX

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>