CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured

To: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured
From: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:37:23 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:58 PM, <john@kk9a.com> wrote:

> This sounds very similar to the current CQWW RTTY rules shown below: There
> is an incentive to work DX but making local stateside QSOs is still
> worthwhile. CQWW RTTY is a fun contest.
>

John's right. CQWW RTTY is a very fun contest, and pretty much implements
the rules being bandied about here. I can attest that - while there is
still the inevitable EU advantage from the east coast - it is possible to
do well in this contest from a non-eastern location.

The next CQWW RTTY is at the end of September. Give it a try. ;)

73 jeff wk6i




-- 
Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com
Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>