CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RM11708 and the Future

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RM11708 and the Future
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:00:36 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Wed,8/24/2016 12:16 PM, Ward Silver wrote:
There are a lot of things in ham radio that don't particularly float my boat but I am willing to consider the use of our allocations by licensed amateurs to be "ham radio."

My problem with broadband digital modes is that, for the most part, the only thing they have to do with ham radio is their use of the ham bands for transmission. I strongly suspect that most if not all of what they are transmitting also has little if anything to do with ham radio. I see little, if any, difference between them and the mindless ragchewing on our SSB bands and on FM repeaters.

To me, ham radio is about the technical side radio and other technology that is related to using it. It is not about exchanging email to boaters, nor to the mindless transmission of "brag" files on various digital modes, nor to mindless ragchewing. I have no problem with broadband digital modes on ham bands provided that 1) they are limited to frequencies where broadband modes like SSB and AM are permitted, and 2) they must abide by the some non-interference rules as all other modes, and 3) those rules are enforced.

One practical problem is that users of one mode often fail to respect (or even recognize) signals produced by another mode. Another is that some broadband digital modes are not all that easy to decode, so that, for example, most of our volunteer OO team are unlikely to be able to even identify them.

I don't want to start off an argument about hybrid network-RF operating - it's something we do via ham radio and that is sufficient for me. I happen to think it's pretty cool that hams have created a world-wide network to exchange messages using sophisticated digital protocols that in some cases, such as WINMOR, were developed non-commercially. You are entitled to your preferences, of course.

Yes, that's cool. But why on the HF bands, as opposed to VHF and UHF?

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>