CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC
From: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:44:45 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
This sounds like it is turning into a Colin Kaepernick NFL debacle.

The outcome isn't gonna be good with all the bitching. 73
Tom W7WHY

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com> wrote:

> My comment was aimed more at "we have to merge SO/SOA so cheaters can't
> cheat."
>
> There was cheating some years ago where a "SO2R" operator was actually
> suspected to actually have a 2nd operator and reclassified/DQed (can't
> remember which). So to eliminate this, we should take the incentive to
> cheat away by segregating SO2R into multiop.
>
> Of course, that won't happen.
>
> But I hear the drumbeat of "We have to merge, we have to merge, cheaters
> are coming!" and I don't like it one bit,
>
> Things sound ridiculous when we take them to extremes.
>
> We don't notice until our way of operating is affected.
>
> Ria
> N2RJ
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>