CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC

To: "sawyered@earthlink.net" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC
From: brian coyne via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:06:11 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
>>> I am sure many other SO2R operators feel the same as I do.
I am happy to accept that ED but there a great number of ops who are not so 
skilled, not necessarily dual in band but SO2R in general who either put their 
cq calls on repeat, or come blasting back without a care, those traits are 
selfishness particularly so in major events where we are competing for space. 
Those guys should learn that when the other radio qso has taken a long time , 
like when needing fills, which happens to all of us, they should act big when 
finding another user on their run qrg and move on as you do yourself.
73  Brian 5B4AIZ. 

      From: Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net>
 To: 'brian coyne' <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk> 
Cc: 'CQ-Contest Reflector' <cq-contest@contesting.com>
 Sent: Tuesday, 14 March 2017, 20:18
 Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC
   
#yiv7290955989 #yiv7290955989 -- _filtered #yiv7290955989 
{font-family:Helvetica;panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;} _filtered #yiv7290955989 
{font-family:Helvetica;panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;} _filtered #yiv7290955989 
{font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv7290955989 
{font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} _filtered #yiv7290955989 
{panose-1:2 5 6 4 5 5 5 2 2 4;} _filtered #yiv7290955989 {panose-1:2 11 5 2 4 2 
4 2 2 3;}#yiv7290955989 #yiv7290955989 p.yiv7290955989MsoNormal, #yiv7290955989 
li.yiv7290955989MsoNormal, #yiv7290955989 div.yiv7290955989MsoNormal 
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv7290955989 a:link, 
#yiv7290955989 span.yiv7290955989MsoHyperlink 
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv7290955989 a:visited, #yiv7290955989 
span.yiv7290955989MsoHyperlinkFollowed 
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv7290955989 
p.yiv7290955989MsoAcetate, #yiv7290955989 li.yiv7290955989MsoAcetate, 
#yiv7290955989 div.yiv7290955989MsoAcetate 
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:8.0pt;}#yiv7290955989 
span.yiv7290955989BalloonTextChar {}#yiv7290955989 
span.yiv7290955989EmailStyle19 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv7290955989 
.yiv7290955989MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv7290955989 
{margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv7290955989 div.yiv7290955989WordSection1 
{}#yiv7290955989 Brian, Thanks for the reply.  But I defy you to know when I am 
on radio 2 by listening to my run frequency.  I can answer a CQ response and 
interleave a second radio 2 Q and you would not know the difference.  The magic 
of doing that is “the art”.  And when I can’t do it, I don’t call the Radio 2 
Q.  The only time I would be “coming back to my frequency” and hoping to get 
back on is if I took a bio break. And if I lost it, I lost it.  I am sure many 
other SO2R operators feel the same as I do.  73  Ed  N1UR  From: brian coyne 
[mailto:g4odv@yahoo.co.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 1:57 PM
To: sawyered@earthlink.net
Cc: CQ-Contest Reflector
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC  >>>I am not 
"using more bandwidth" on the same band.    That is debatable ED and is only 
really true where an op returning to the first radio following a cq,call,or 
contact,on the second radio  cedes that first frequency when finding another 
stn has moved in. How many do that without starting a frequency fight? - I 
don't come across many.  73  Brian 5B4AIZ.  From: Ed Sawyer 
<sawyered@earthlink.net>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com 
Sent: Tuesday, 14 March 2017, 15:53
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC  For the record, I 
often SO2R on the same band.  However I am not dual CQingon the same band.  So 
- I am not "using more bandwidth" on the same band.      I agree with KK9A that 
if 2 or more bands are wide open, dual CQing on 2bands is no different use of 
space than dual CQing on one band.  But in thebottom half of the sunspot cycle, 
there is a difference because for goodchunks of time, there might be only one 
optimum band for a circuit (ie - NAto EU).  I think ARRL should make it against 
the rules like CQ has.        Ed  N1UR  
_______________________________________________CQ-Contest mailing 
listCQ-Contest@contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
  

   
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>