I agree if all multis interleaved on the same band that the bands would be
excessively crowded. It is already hard enough to find and hold a clear
frequency, especially on SSB. However if the thousands of single ops also
started running on two bands (2BSIQ) QRM would even be worse. Where do you
draw the line?
The four operators at PJ4G had a fantastic M/2 score. They even had 750 more
QSOs than nearby M/M PJ2T with sixteen operators.
John KK9A
From: donovanf@starpower.net [mailto:donovanf@starpower.net]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 5:00 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC
First, its clear that ARRL rules do not address the issue of two
interleaving run stations on the same band. That leaves it up to
the community to decide what to do.
According to 3830 there were sixty multi-op entries in the ARRL
SSB DX Contest. What happens to this contest if all sixty of us
start using interleaved two run stations on 20 meters?
on 15 meters?
Even worse: on 40 meters?
Do we all want to follow PJ4G's lead?
73
Frank
W3LPL
_____
From: "Ria Jairam" <rjairam@gmail.com>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com, john@kk9a.com
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 8:09:39 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC
Some bands are more limited in space than others.
40m - 75kHz
20m - 200kHz
15m - 250kHz
10m - 1.4MHz
Some bands are more productive than others, depending on propagation.
So with two CQs by one station on the same band the station engaging in
this practice takes up twice the space and denies others the use of the
productive or limited space band.
CQing on two bands is different because the other band may not be as
productive, and even underused in low solar years.
Ria
N2RJ
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:58 PM john@kk9a.com <john@kk9a.com> wrote:
> As far as spectrum usage goes what is the difference between this and a
> single op CQing on two bands?
>
> KK9A
>
>
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC
> From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:32:05 -0600
>
>
> Jeff,
>
> Thanks for the comments. I agree with your interpretation of the rules, I
> don't like that it is allowed and like many have asked the ARRL to close
> this loophole.
>
> Many believe that if everyone adopted this philosophy that the band would
> be a mess. People would have a very difficult time finding a place to CQ
> unless you were a big gun etc.
>
> 73 and thanks for all the contacts from everywhere!
>
> W0MU
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|