CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC

To: "sawyered@earthlink.net" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC
From: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:11:58 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
So using two radios vs using one radio is no different? Really?  Check the 
stats. 

Marty
W1MD

> On Mar 15, 2017, at 2:09 PM, Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
> Relative to spectrum usage, if a station is CQing over and over without
> being called - he is using spectrum.  If he answers a call, he uses no more
> spectrum than the repeated CQ being unanswered.  If an SO2R op calls him on
> the 2nd radio, that 2nd radio call uses no more spectrum than if there is no
> 2nd radio used.  The next increment of time on the used spectrum slot is
> either another CQ or a QSO exchange, but in either case the spectrum will
> continue to be used.
> 
> 
> 
> If dual CQing is going on by a single operator, it clearly uses more
> spectrum.  They are not the same.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> SO2R has nothing to do with fairness any more than have a 4 sq in a salt
> marsh on 160 is fair vs the rest of the competing world using inv Ls or
> dipoles or verticals over normal soil.
> 
> 
> 
> When someone lies about using assistance to gain an unfair advantage, that
> is just plain cheating.  Mushing SO2R and lieing serves no purpose and is
> uncalled for.
> 
> 
> 
> 73
> 
> 
> 
> Ed  N1UR
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>