CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to QSY?

To: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>, Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to QSY?
From: k2ttt <k2ttt@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 10:57:09 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
    
We just added a "non-contestor" to our team, he thought he was only a dxer but 
a few hours in front of a contest station proved him wrong..Never pressured him 
for runs or s& p but the fun of both hooked him. GOFRC and thanks to AJ2I for 
his future participation and contest points, look out YCCC. 73 Jay K2TTT


Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone

-------- Original message --------
From: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com> 
Date: 3/17/17  10:15 AM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: Joe <nss@mwt.net> 
Cc: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com> 
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to QSY? 

Make it worth their while.

The first time I got a certificate in the mail as a surprise it had me
hooked on contesting.

The first time over 1M points I was pretty happy.

The first time I won a plaque I was encouraged even more.

Scoring almost 5M points in WPX had me over the moon.

And so on.

We need to give people an incentive to compete. If it's not worth their
while then they'll just stay off the air during the contest or gripe about
contesting.

Ria
N2RJ

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Joe <nss@mwt.net> wrote:

> How about how to get new blood into Contesting?
>
> OR
>
> How to combat the anti Contesting crowd?
>
> Just getting these anti folk to try it it's amazing the results.
> 90% of these guys that crab about them damm contesters are clogging up the
> bands again, I cant talk to bubba about nascar today.
> 9 out of 10 of these people when I finally get them to sit down and try
> it, explaining what it is all about 9 out of 10 end up loving it!
>
> It is all human nature, if something is scary or you do not understand it,
> nature makes you not like it.
>
> Joe WB9SBD
> Sig
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
>
> On 3/16/2017 4:08 PM, K1AR via CQ-Contest wrote:
>
>> OK everyone -- unless someone has something new and profound to offer, I
>> suggest we move on to a new thread. How about a discussion on leveling the
>> playing field in contesting? Or, perhaps the impact of spotting, RBN and
>> packet  on contest operating? Maybe we can debate the merits of combining
>> assisted  and unassisted.
>>   NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>   Something new folks? Anything? Please?
>>   Thank you.
>>   73, John, K1AR
>>   _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>