CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS

To: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 09:11:54 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I think it bothers more people that people are using databases that they did not create to attempt to give them an advantage in the contest than it does people changing their check.  The agenda is penalizing people that use databases instead of copying what was sent.

John you can send whatever prec you want.  I hope it matches the log you are sending in.  If you are not sending in a log then it doesn't matter at all.  People have inadvertently changed their prec in the middle of a contest by using packet by mistake or forgot to turn the amp off etc.

You can break the speed limit in most places by up to 5 mph. This is not much different.

I wish you well running those pileups on 60m.

W0MU


On 11/9/2017 9:00 AM, John Geiger wrote:
In terms of the check, yes, it can be hard at times to remember what year it was or to know which operators year to use, but does it bother anyone else when some people on this reflector mention that they are going to purposely violate this rule for one agenda or another?  If it is stated in the rules what the check is supposed to be, stations should follow it to the best of their memory (of year first licensed).  Yes, the ARRL might not enforce it, but still, it is in the rules.  I guess I could send whatever PREC I want also since it has no bearing on others scores.  I am sure one of the letters of A, B, U, M, Q and S are the easiest to copy, so I could just pick that one and send it.

Along a related lines, I have seen the rules for some state QSO parties where they mention you can use all HF bands except the WARC bands.  That allows me to run their contest on 60 meter!  60 meters is not a WARC band.  I didn't do it, but their rules allowed for it

73 John AF5CC

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:05 AM, W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com <mailto:w0mu@w0mu.com>> wrote:

    Not to mention the cases of multi ops, people that can't remember
    exactly etc.

    People using whatever they want for a check has zero impact on the
    contest.

    As the competitor copy what is sent and log it and work the next guy.

    The rules do not specify that all competitors should start with
    QSO #1.  Starting with another number to attempt to dissuade
    competition probably breaks some other type of sportsmanship
    rule.  I have heard of people doing this.  I have no proof that it
    was ever done.  Do your best and let the chips fall where they
    may.  Even if someone had 100 more contacts than you did, you have
    no clue how much time they have in or if they even intend to
    finish the contest, heck who knows, maybe the amp dies or the
    power goes out for that station.

    I would hope that everyone would start with Qso #1.

    W0MU


    On 11/9/2017 6:41 AM, Zack Widup wrote:

        How would you know, anyway? You could look back through my
        records and
        maybe find that I've had the W9SZ call since 1977. But you
        wouldn't be
        able to easily find the call I had before that. Or when I was
        first
        licensed. Would you want to spend the time to do this to
        everyone you
        worked to find out if someone was breaking a rule by giving a
        different year? I have better things to do with my time.

        And the check number does not affect my score or anyone else's
        - that
        is, if I gave a wrong section, it would possibly affect someone's
        score if they only worked me in the section I was reporting.
        The check
        is just a number to copy.

        I suppose this has been asked, too, but do you have to start
        with the
        number 1 on the contest? I know it says consecutive serial
        numbers,
        but what if you started with 200 or 500?

        73, Zack W9SZ


        On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net
        <mailto:ve4xt@mymts.net>> wrote:

            Mike’s right. FFS, the League, which is the FINAL arbiter
            of all things ruleswise, has said it doesn’t matter, as
            long as people copy what you send..

            Ergo, it DOESN’T MATTER. Copy what is sent, move on to the
            next Q. Save your mental energy for things that really matter.

            73, kelly, ve4xt


                On Nov 8, 2017, at 7:15 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett
                <w0mu@w0mu.com <mailto:w0mu@w0mu.com>> wrote:

                This discussion has been going on now for what as long
                at the CQ-Contest reflector has been around and yet
                most people still send their check right.

                Just copy what is sent and move on.  The data sent and
                received has no meaning.  It is an arbitrary part of
                the exchange.  Why not make it your grid square.  Then
                it can't change and would go along well with the new
                ARRL operating event for next year...............Grid
                squares worked!

                W0MU


                On 11/8/2017 5:17 PM, Mike/W5JR wrote:

                    Sounds like everyone is going to be sending "55"
                    next year.

                    tnx
                    Mike / W5JR
                    Alpharetta GA

                    sent via my HP95LX

                        On Nov 8, 2017, at 2:37 PM, John Geiger
                        <af5cc2@gmail.com <mailto:af5cc2@gmail.com>>
                        wrote:

                        What is the point of the ARRL stating in the
                        rules that the check is the
                        year first licensed, if they really don't care
                        what you send?

                        73 John AF5CC

                            On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:51 AM, W0MU Mike
                            Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com
                            <mailto:w0mu@w0mu.com>> wrote:

                            I think most people try to use their
                            actual year licensed.

                            That would be a good question to ask on
                            the entry form.   What year were
                            you licensed.  It think we all know that
                            new hams are hard to come by and
                            many are not interested in contesting.

                            W0MU


                                On 11/7/2017 1:54 PM, ShelbyK4WW wrote:

                                Why are so many putting so much
                                emphasis on the CK, as anything more than
                                a
                                "randomly chosen two digit number that
                                is consistently used throughout the
                                contest", having absolutely no
                                relation to anything? ARRL has
                                indicated it
                                will not enforce the CK as being "The
                                last 2 digits of the year of first
                                license for either the operator or the
                                station", and many have indicated
                                that they change their CK, from year
                                to year? It certainly has little, if
                                any, bearing on when they were licensed?
                                As far as CW speed is concerned, when
                                I call another station, I feel
                                obligated to try and match their
                                speed. Sometimes this requires me to
                                listen to several contacts, before
                                calling. I expect, and usually receive,
                                the same consideration, when I'm
                                called? I fail to see any logic to
                                calling
                                at a much higher speed, then having to
                                endure several repeats?

                                In it to win it? Not a chance
                                In it to have fun? Most definitely

                                73, Shelby - K4WW
                                As I don't have an iPad nor iPhone,
                                sent from my PC
                                _______________________________________________
                                CQ-Contest mailing list
                                CQ-Contest@contesting.com
                                <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
                                
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
                                
<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>

                            _______________________________________________
                            CQ-Contest mailing list
                            CQ-Contest@contesting.com
                            <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
                            
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
                            
<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>

                        _______________________________________________
                        CQ-Contest mailing list
                        CQ-Contest@contesting.com
                        <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
                        http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
                        
<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>

                    _______________________________________________
                    CQ-Contest mailing list
                    CQ-Contest@contesting.com
                    <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
                    http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
                    <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>

                _______________________________________________
                CQ-Contest mailing list
                CQ-Contest@contesting.com
                <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
                http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
                <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>

            _______________________________________________
            CQ-Contest mailing list
            CQ-Contest@contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
            http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
            <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>

        <div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br />
        <table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;">
                <tr>
                 <td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 13px;"><a
        
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon
        
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>"
        target="_blank"><img
        
src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif
        
<https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif>"
        alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;"
        /></a></td>
                        <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 12px;
        color: #41424e;
        font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
        line-height: 18px;">Virus-free. <a
        
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link
        
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>"
        target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avast.com
        <http://www.avast.com></a>
                        </td>
                </tr>
        </table><a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1"
        height="1"></a></div>
        _______________________________________________
        CQ-Contest mailing list
        CQ-Contest@contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
        http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
        <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>


    _______________________________________________
    CQ-Contest mailing list
    CQ-Contest@contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
    http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
    <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>