CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS

To: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS
From: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 23:59:33 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Ah.  So I will instead note that the Sweepstakes rules don’t specify which 
calendar is to be used when determining the prescribed check.  :)

--
Michael Adams | mda@n1en.org

From: John Geiger [mailto:af5cc2@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 9 November, 2017 18:47
To: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Cc: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Check In SS

But the RS in the RST is completely subjective.  What is S9-extremely strong 
signals-compared to?  I choose to compare them all to the signal being sent 
back to Earth by Pioneer 10.
73 John AF5CC

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Michael Adams 
<mda@n1en.org<mailto:mda@n1en.org>> wrote:
On the subject of the appropriateness of sending something other than the 
correct year-first-licensed as a check during SS, allow me to play devil's 
advocate.

Isn't a signal report part of the required exchange in many contests?

I wonder how many folks who want accurate SS checks ever send anything other 
than 5NN / 59 / 599 as their signal reports in those contests.

--
Michael Adams | mda@n1en.org<mailto:mda@n1en.org>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>