If they brought back the original "Novice Roundup" It would be
incredible! Not this disaster "Rookie Roundup" that they are trying to
pass off as the "Novice Roundup"
It is soo sad this new version has sooo little interest that a person in
many sections can get on and make ONE contact and take first place.
Bring back the original "Novice Roundup" in the exact same format too.
Max op time of what 24 or 30 hours, but ya got ten days to do it in!
Plus a little Updating, Make it also like say Field Day. you can work
someone on Phone, CW, and Digital. work each station 3 times,
ONLY Beginners can CQ,
Novices work anyone, non novices work ONLY beginners.
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 3/20/2018 8:47 AM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
I chase counties and we had a large group of SSB ops start to try CW.
They started slow, made lots of mistakes, but after time many of them
have gotten much much better. Would any of them call into to a
station sending 30 wpm plus. Nope. Would they if you were sending 15
to 20........Maybe if they were encouraged. There are lots of people
chasing all kinds of awards with counties or grids or states, etc that
would live to work you. They are just not going to be blown away at
high speed.
I don't thing forcing people to learn CW or operate that mode made
much impact on the CW bands in the past. I think they are more
crowded today than ever. It used to be you could work DX on RTTY and
CW as there were far less people to deal with. That is not the case
anymore with either mode.
We don't do a good job at nurturing new CW ops along. I am not even
sure the best way to nurture them other than education and trying to
slow down. I thing the Novice Roundup is gone as that was the one
contest a Novice or Tech could get into where they were target
audience and could get the taste of what contesting is and many more
experienced contesters would get on and hand out contacts. Is this
something that can be recaptured? Would it help?
W0MU
On 3/19/2018 11:33 AM, Bill via CQ-Contest wrote:
Lots of common sense in this post.
The main problem remains. CW is a dying art and the FCC put that
concept in high gear with no-code licenses. People no longer have
to, and most don't want to learn the code. It's as simple as that.
If you compare the checks in your logs you'll see lots of 2010-2017
for SSB but a much lower number for the CW.
Bill KH7XS/K4XS
-----Original Message-----
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
To: cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; cac-i
<cac-i@reflector.arrl.org>
Sent: Mon, Mar 19, 2018 3:51 pm
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] NCJ Article RE: Sweepstakes Change Suggestions
I don't receive the NCJ so I have not read the article. What I
gather is that most people feel that the SSB part of the contest is
ok but the CW part is not. If most people feel that SSB fine the way
it is, are people suggesting we make sweeping changes to fix the CW
portion and then possibly breaking both?The exchange is long. It
makes the contest different. This is good. As stated by many we
have plenty of rate contests where copying is not part of the
contest.I have heard of lots of ideas but none of them really address
the issue which is getting more people involved on the CW side.
Their are plenty of people trying CW or are proficient enough at
slower speeds. Most of the ideas allow more contacts from the same
participants on other bands or by using other callsigns. The
reason the radio/callsign rules were put in place as I understand it,
that when the club competitions were fierce, I don't thing they are
as much any more, people would use other calls and onl
y work their club members. I get that. Good for them, but not
good for the overall health of the contest. I am sure people still
do it, tough to catch. SO2R changed much of contesting, tough to put
it back in the black box.Is the CW solution a simple as slowing down
and encouraging new or less competent cw ops to want to call you or
is the goal to run at 45wpm and work nobody and listen to endless
CQ's? Will slowing down even help? Maybe the ARRL needs to print
some articles on encouraging people to try SS CW and explaining it
better?The last couple hours of SS can be pretty fun. Many people
get on just for that period.Who are we fixing the contest for? The
top 50 or 100 that are the real competitors or are we making it fun
and better for all?What we could be doing is breaking down the
classes and putting the SO2 elite ops in one category and then trying
to figure out how to put the rest in appropriate categories so we can
do a better job at acknowledging them and
creating competition with similar stations and skills.NAQP is great
for 12 hours. How would it be for 24 hours. I would suggest that it
would get pretty slow on CW. You can always milk SSB contacts on
open bands. Maybe the NAQP folks should give a 24 hour contest a
try and see how it goes. NAQP has been around a long time now if it
was be so great, why has it never been tried?Changing for the sake of
change is not a good idea. Is the contest really broke? I don't
think so. Could it be improved? Maybe. Could we make it worse?
easily! Making large changes would change what the contest is. I
don't think that is a good
idea.W0MU_______________________________________________CQ-Contest
mailing
listCQ-Contest@contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|