CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Contest in QST

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Contest in QST
From: Mark - N5OT <r-emails@n5ot.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 05:24:25 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It's a good question, Ed.  Thanks.  Given our League, I think all of us will be well served if we face forward and embrace the fundamental shift in the way we as a society consume written periodical content.  I don't hold it against the League (us) to attempt to sustain itself (ourselves).  I can only speak for myself, but once I got past being bound to a print magazine, and I started enjoying the way the (vastly enhanced) content is presented on the 'web, it gave me a new, different, and better outlook.  I reiterate I am only speaking for myself, but I wonder if what I am saying resonates?  Certainly contesters have been squirming about this exact thing ("reduced" coverage of contests) for so long, it sounds like a debate about incentive licensing :-)

I imagine we're all different about this and how much we like the physical magazine in our hands.  It is not an easy question.

73 - Mark N5OT

On 8/26/2019 8:44 PM, Edward Sawyer wrote:
Mark, With all due respect, in the next 2 years do we expect the last 2 pages 
to also disappear?  Why not, at least then the attitude at QST will be so 
obvious it can't be ignored.  What will really be telling is if all of a sudden 
FT8 contests get multiple page spreads.  Then the cycle will be complete.

Ed  N1UR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>