CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [CQ-Contest] RST?

from [Lee Hiers] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: JOHN GEIGER <af5cc1@zohomail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RST?
From: Lee Hiers <lee.hiers@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:10:03 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> 
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 3:27 PM JOHN GEIGER via CQ-Contest <
cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:


> What problem currently exists with using RST as part of the exchange that
> we need to fix?  I wouldn't define giving everyone a 599 or 59 as a
> "problem".
>

Ding-ding-ding!  We have a winner!

If you want to see some RST silliness (IMO), see N7RR's replacement for RST
that he'd like to implement...on his QRZ page.

73 de Lee, AA4GA
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [CQ-Contest] RST?, JOHN GEIGER via CQ-Contest
Next by Date:  Re: [CQ-Contest] RST?, Jim Brown
Previous by Thread:  Re: [CQ-Contest] RST?, JOHN GEIGER via CQ-Contest
Next by Thread:  [CQ-Contest] RST, cqtestk4xs--- via CQ-Contest
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]