Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Karlnet] KN-200 better thanAP-1000?WASFlashromhardware?HowaboutaRou

To: "'Karlnet Mailing List'" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] KN-200 better thanAP-1000?WASFlashromhardware?HowaboutaRouterboard 230?
From: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Reply-to: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:34:25 -0600
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Actually, the tertiary firmware does not really upload the software to
the card, it just overrides it.  If any of you remember re-flashing
radio cards, it was a pain in the rear!

Kevin

**************************************
Kevin R. Knuth
Business Development Manager
North America
260-424-9690 Regional Office
614-822-5275 Corporate Office
kknuth@karlnet.com
www.karlnet.com
**************************************
 


-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of Jayson Baker
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 11:27 AM
To: 'Karlnet Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] KN-200 better
thanAP-1000?WASFlashromhardware?Howabouta Routerboard 230?


Then I guess it makes sense that an KN-200 would blow away an old WPII!

Great!  Needed a reason to make a trip up to that site before it snows.

Regards,
Jayson A. Baker
Peak Internet Solutions

-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]
On Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:24 AM
To: Karlnet Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] KN-200 better than
AP-1000?WASFlashromhardware?Howabouta Routerboard 230?

It is my understanding that the newer versions of Karlnet updated the
flash on the Orinoco cards to the preferred level during boot.

I believe the hardware is all the same on the silver cards, old or new.
We are really just talking about processing power to handle the polling
efficiently.

-bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
To: "'Karlnet Mailing List'" <karlnet@wispnotes.com>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 11:16 AM
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] KN-200 better than
AP-1000?WASFlashromhardware?Howabout a Routerboard 230?


> Oh yeah, I remember the days of Boot ROM.
> But if Karlnet is booting on an Ethernet interface - this doesn't do 
> me
much
> good getting it into a Silver card, does it?
>
> Regards,
> Jayson A. Baker
> Peak Internet Solutions
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com 
> [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]
> On Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:15 AM
> To: Karlnet Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Karlnet] KN-200 better than AP-1000?
> WASFlashromhardware?Howabout a Routerboard 230?
>
> NO, flashrom is not CF flash.  It is a PC setup with an ethernet card 
> and
a
> FLASHROM plugged into it that has the boot code on it.  You've 
> probably never even paid attention to many of the older ethernet cards

> with the
black
> rom plugs on them.
>
> The rom holds the boot code, in this case Karlnet.  You plug the boot 
> rom enabled ethernet card and that becomes the fixed boot disk.
>
> -bob
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
> To: "'Karlnet Mailing List'" <karlnet@wispnotes.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 11:11 AM
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] KN-200 better than AP-1000? WAS 
> Flashromhardware?Howabout a Routerboard 230?
>
>
> > "stable flashrom setup"
> >
> > What, exactly, does that mean?
> >
> > The KN boards have flash slots - what would someone use that for?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jayson A. Baker
> > Peak Internet Solutions
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]
> > On Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
> > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:10 AM
> > To: Karlnet Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [Karlnet] KN-200 better than AP-1000? WAS Flashrom 
> > hardware?Howabout a Routerboard 230?
> >
> > Yeah, the KN-200 is better, but maybe you should just skip the 
> > kn-200
step
> > altogether if you can find a stable Flashrom setup.
> >
> > I saw a huge performance increase with the upgrade.
> >
> > -bob
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>
> > To: "'Karlnet Mailing List'" <karlnet@wispnotes.com>
> > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 11:07 AM
> > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] KN-200 better than AP-1000? WAS Flashrom
> hardware?How
> > about a Routerboard 230?
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The KN-200 is better than an AP-1000/WavePoint-II?
> > > We currently have a WavePoint-II w/ ISP Base software at one of 
> > > our (actually, our only) Turbocell site.  It has about 30 
> > > satellites on it
> > right
> > > now (KN-100's).
> > >
> > > Latency is always all over the place... is this not because of the

> > > super-packet aggregation (or whatever it's called)?  Should we 
> > > upgrade
> > that
> > > WPII to a KN-200?
> > >
> > > Will we get better throughput and lower latency, or is it not 
> > > worth
the
> > 2hr
> > > drive up a very rocky mountain to change out the unit?  We're also
> running
> > > an older Lucent Silver card - should this be upgraded?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jayson A. Baker
> > > Peak Internet Solutions
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]
> > > On Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
> > > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:02 AM
> > > To: Karlnet Mailing List
> > > Subject: [Karlnet] Flashrom hardware? How about a Routerboard 230?
> > >
> > > I need a flashrom setup to handle a growing cell site.  I have 
> > > about
50
> > > clients on a KN-200 board ( at least I think it is...it's the one 
> > > with
> two
> > > PCMCIA interfaces).   We upgraded from and AP-1000 when
performance
was
> > > getting poor and it was NIGHT and day difference on ping 
> > > times/latency
> and
> > > user perception of performance.
> > >
> > > Well, ping times are getting high again and I was considering
replacing
> > the
> > > KN-200 w/ some sort of a flashrom box.   I want something small (a
> little
> > > larger than an AP-1000 would be ok but not much more.  I just 
> > > don't
have
> > > room for it.
> > >
> > > Will the karlnet flashrom setup run on a routerboard 230 from
Mikrotik?
> > >
> > > It's a 266Mhz setup and outdoor rated w/ a PCI slot and 2 PCMCIA
slots,
> I
> > > believe.  Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bob
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com 
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com 
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com 
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com 
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com 
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com 
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>

_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet

_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet


_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>