Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Karlnet] Versions

To: "'Karlnet Mailing List'" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Versions
From: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Reply-to: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:40:35 -0400
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Cj 

You didn't answer my question though, are you watching traffic in real
time that is going across the ap1000?

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On
> Behalf Of cj
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 6:32 PM
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> Subject: [Karlnet] Versions
> 
> ya, i've done everything i can think of to track down this problem.
i've sat
> there with a sniffer, used packet generators to see if i could
simulate it,
> messed with every clients transmit rate dependant upon how many
retransmits
> were occuring, nothing.  It is a little better now from messing with
the
> transmit rate.  It seems to only occur with base stations with > 20
> clients(just an estimate) on them and with a low noise floor <70db.
> 
> i've about had it though, ive just gotten quotes for canopy and im
starting to
> think that might be the best alternative. the cpe costs are down to
250-275
> and i can do QoS for voice over ip or stuff with it.  karlnet CPE
costs are
> crazy, especially if you need an amp and want remote management.  Sure
, you
> could just use the USB client, but troubleshooting is a nightmare.
> 
> thanks
> cj


-- 
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>