[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Tv interference

To: Jim P <jvpoll@dallas.net>, Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>,RFI List <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Tv interference
From: "Leigh L Klotz, Jr." <Leigh@WA5ZNU.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:49:44 -0800
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
When I raised the alarm about these on eHam, I was told to get a life.  
But I will support any effort to get manufacturers to recognize their 
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:32 am, Jim P wrote:
> It seems to me that the 'exemption' IS the
> result of lazafaire gov't regulation, and, the
> provsion in the law ALLOWS regulation if
> and when inteference begins to be expereinced.
> It hasn't been until the last few years that solid
> state uP driven motor controls were put into the larger
> widely-available consumer appliances like washers
> and dryers (AND treadmills, as I have experienced ).
> The Libertarian view would have no reguation what-
> soever, with local problems corrected by lawsuit
> or something else more in the vein of mediation
> between the troubled parties rather than provisions
> in the law drawn up beforehand.
> Jim P  // WB5WPA //
RFI mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>