RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:58 -0500
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
On 12/26/2012 10:36 AM, Dale Svetanoff wrote:
Cortland,

Thank you for reinforcing my point about the FCC's deplorable lack of guts
and common sense with emissions.  The situation for TV receivers, plus the
general lack of radiated emissions requirements testing below 26 MHz for
Part 15 devices, sure does raise havoc with HF communications.


I seriously doubt it's "lack of guts", although common sense is another issue.

If you look at their recent history you should easily identify a trend. Look at what they did with LightSquared, violating their own rules in the process. Look at the revolving door from the agency to high places in industry. Not saying they have a conflict of interest, but when they have to violate their own rules to please the present administration it might lead to an atmosphere of trying to please...well, use your imagination.


OTOH shortages of personnel and funds have always been a hallmark of the FCC

Whether it be over regulation or lack of enforcement in specific areas it is endemic across many agencies, not that I'd accuse any of them of favoritism or wrong doing. Far from it. I'm sure they "Want" to do as their charter says if they were allowed to do so.



73

Roger


One has to wonder what the story would be if the US was to ever have a
licensed, active ham as an FCC Commissioner (not likely anytime soon - if
ever!) who gets clobbered by garbage emissions from Part 15 devices in
his/her home or from neighbors.  Oh well, worth a few chuckles.

73,
Dale Svetanoff, WA9ENA
Sr EMC Engineer
E-N-A Systems, LLC
Specializing in shielding applications, system grounding, and lightning
protection


[Original Message]
From: Cortland Richmond <ka5s@earthlink.net>
To: <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: 12/25/2012 10:53:29
Subject: Re: [RFI] HDTV: Plasma vs LCD

TV receivers are not tested for radiated emissions below 30 MHz.

  From FCC MP-3:

http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/measureme
nt/mp3/mp3-1985.pdf

8.2 Electromagnetic field: 30 MHz to 1 GHz
Any equipment to which it is applicable shall be measured for
radiated radio emissions from all units, cables, power lines and
interconnecting wiring.

IMVH (yeah, right)O we could ask the FCC to revisit this standard, now
that TV receivers have screens large enough to be significant radiators
all on their own.


Cortland Richmond
KA5S
Sr EMC engineer
Belcan Engineering Group.

On 12/25/2012 2319, Dale Svetanoff wrote:
Mike,

They most likely DO pass "testing standards".  That shows what a piss
poor
job the FCC has done with regards to emissions on so many devices.
Remember, the "warning" label on Part 15 and similar devices says that
the
device must not cause interference and it must accept interference.
Right.
Per the FCC, you can go tell your neighbor to not use the TV during
whatever hours you operate.  Lotsa luck.

73,
Dale Svetanoff, WA9ENA
Sr EMC Engineer
E-N-A Systems, LLC
Specializing in shielding applications, system grounding, and lightning
protection


_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi


_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi




_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>