RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] SO2R (again)

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] SO2R (again)
From: w9ol at billnjudy.com (FireBrick)
Date: Sat Jan 25 11:14:11 2003
1 op, 1 signal on the air at a time, 1 class
who cares how many radios there are.


And good news on the Belkin. I have the older version which DID not work.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] SO2R (again)


> >
> > Can someone please explain to me why we can't have an SO2R class??? I'm
> > sorry, but it just seems such an obvious solution...
> >
> > 73/Carter/K8VT
> >
>
> It was explained very well by Tyler, K3MM.  It doesn't make sense to wipe
out
> years of records by creating a separate SO2R class.  I would support
adding a new
> SO1R class.  You could start and set your own records.  We could have an
SOAB
> class as we always do and then have an SO1R class (with band change limits
of
> course to keep everyone honest).
>
> BARTG Sprint pretty slow.  I'm actually running SO1R at the moment,
testing
> a Belkin F5U103 USB-to-serial adapter with the MMTTY plug-in for WriteLog
and
> it's working great generating FSK.  So far, no problems to report.
>
> 73, Don AA5AU
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>