Waldemar DK3VN wrote:
> .........
> It's hard to to find good dates for a new contest. The
> date is
> (second full weekend in September) two weeks after the
> "SCC RTTY"
> and two weeks before a big contest at the end of the
> month. ~:)
> That will be a nice warm up for the "CQ WW RTTY".
>
But a warm up should be not so long.
>
> .......
> Now I have a few questions, mainly based on suggestions,
> received
> from a few HAM's.
>
> Operating time: Would you prefer 48h (SO: 32/48h) or
> 24h?
> If 24h, what's about the time scheme of the SARTG then?
>
My vote is for 18 hours out of 24 or 24 hours without a break!
> What about a bonus for QSO's on 40 and 80 meters? Just to
> keep
> activity on lower bands going. I.e. "Multiply the worked
> distance
> with 1.5 for 40m QSO's and multiply it with 2.0 for 80m
> QSO's".
> I am not sure, if this would favor the operators in high
> populated areas???
>
That's why I think there shouldn't be any bonus points. The goal is to
maximize the accumulated distance. And so every ham must use the most
suitable bands for exactly that goal.
>
> And last but not least: If you want to be a member of
> the
> Contest Supporting Group, I need you help and not your
> money,
> then let me know, please!
Please let me know what you need to my personal email address.
>
73 + 55
Wolf, DL6JZ
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|