On Monday 27 September 2004 20:04, Peter Laws wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 w2nra@optonline.net wrote:
>
> -> Oh well, I submitted my log, so should I feel sorry for the HB0 that
> -> will have one less Q he's going to get credit for?
>
> Many stations seem to have me in their logs as N5UW or N9UWY/9 no matter
> how many times I re-rend the call, so don't feel *too* bad. :-)
>
> A write-up in NCJ about working dupes would be a good start, but it needs
> to be in the "mainstream" magazines as well. Overseas too.
We will be able to survive without that one QSO...
I usually just work a dupe and let the software do the rest. When you called I
was at the station and was a little bit surprised that the owner of the
computer we used programmed that exchange 'wkd b4'... not m< st<le and we
constantly argue what is better, hi hi.
73,
Ekki, DF4OR (op HB0/DJ5BX)
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|