The category would be SO Assisted (or Unlimited), not just SO. Since it
would be a separate category, it would not be in competition with SO. If
ALL single-ops were allowed to use packet (not as a separate category),
that would be a different matter. I feel that it should definitely be a
separate category.
73,
Jim N6VH
Bill Turner wrote:
> At 08:59 PM 12/13/2005, Mike wrote:
>
>
>
>>My feelings as well, Jim. I would like it to go further and allow
>>packet in any of the SO classes.
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> This has been beat nearly to death, but I see it's still twitching.
>
> The essence is "If another ham else is feeding you spots, how can
> that possibly be "single operator"?
>
> 'Splain yourself, Lucy. :-)
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|