| To: | "RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules |
| From: | Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:10:32 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
You are likely right, but I wonder why the resistance to change? The only reason I can think of is not very complimentary to the 2R ops. 73, Bill W6WRT ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ORIGINAL MESSAGE: At 02:17 AM 12/18/2005, Shelby Summerville wrote: >The SO1R vs SO2R debate will likely go on forever, and likely will never be >resolved? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules/Less thanPerfect, Bill Turner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Did OK accept Cabrillo last year?, Andrei Nevis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules, John Fleming |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules, Bill Turner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |