RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse...

To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse...
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Reply-to: dezrat@copper.net
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:05:13 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:34:16 -0400, you wrote:


>If you are going to create a limited class, make it the lowest common 
>denominator so that everyone has an equal chance.  

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Lowest common denominator would probably be a two meter HT. 

You are going at it backwards, Joe. I'm not trying to define a class
which would fit all existing stations, but rather which would fit many
if not most and - this is important - would give people a reasonable
target to aim for if they want to compete in the Limited Class. If
they want more, go to the Unlimited Class. If they're already in
Unlimited (as I am, having a four element quad), and they prefer
Limited, change the hardware to fit. Nobody would be forced to choose
one or the other and remain in it for life. Times change, people's
desires change and folks should be able to tweak their station to fit
in whatever class they like best.

Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>