RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting

To: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>, rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] re the blacklisting
From: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Reply-to: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
--- Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net> asked:

> Why would you say up 1 instead of just up?

Sometimes the callers can't hear each other.  If I send "UP" do I mean up 1, up
5, what?  Plus, up 1 gives enough space to keep my Tx freq clear.

Running a pileup well has two related properties:

- work guys as fast as possible
- use the least bandwidth possible

You can spread guys WAY out, but the rate will go down (you have to search for
the callers).  You can have everyone call on the same frequency, and the rate
will go down (hard to pick out full calls).  There is some happy medium.

If I say "up 1" and I'm working 200/hour up 2, why change anything?  If the
lids can't figure out where I'm listening, then they won't slow down my rate,
as long as they're not calling me way up the band, which defeats the least
bandwidth principle.

73 - Jim AD1C


--
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>