RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] macros

To: "'Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604'" <faunt@panix.com>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] macros
From: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:11:03 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I only had one station send me 5nn.  Not that I made a ton of contacts but
this is an improvement.  Some people strung together the report and sn which
was a pain 599005599005.

What is the current feeling on 599 002-002 with the dash? 


"A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may
never get over." Ben Franklin
-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:04 AM
To: w2nra@optonline.net
Cc: chen@mac.com; rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] macros

Apparently the op who was sending 5NN was "Jerry".

73, doug

   Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:57:55 -0500
   From: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>

   Hi Chen,

   I worked K5D on 20m and 30m in RTTY.  599 both times:


   > Speaking of odd practices, did any of you tell Glenn not to use "5NN"  
   > in the K5D exchanges?  I know I didn't.  But the extra <LTRS> which  
   > he sent with the 5NN probably slowed him down by a fraction.
   >
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>