Yes, but a extra space (or CR) adds almost 22 ms to an exchange and, well,
those add up, don't they? Wasn't there a thread discussing that here just
recently?
;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^)
Al
AB2ZY
-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Bill, W6WRT
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 8:54 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:20:58 -0500 (EST), W70m@aol.com wrote:
>For purposes of a thread, I find the use of carriage returns at the
>termination of a macro to save a lot of repeats; not to mention busted
>calls
REPLY:
A carriage return is better than nothing, but even better is just a single
space. The carriage return with some software will cause the text to jump up a
line just as you are trying to click on it. A space serves the same purpose of
separating text from noise but avoids the jump.
73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|