I think it all might be a moot point.
In looking at the results, I see where 9 people submitted a score to 3830.
Don't look like there is all that much interest, sad to say. Maybe if they
didn't schedule it with 5 other contests on the same weekend??
I didn't get on as I was in 3 other contests this weekend (4 if you count CW
Ops twice). 73
Tom W7WHY
> Gary (et al),
>
> Believe me, I share your frustration with the rules. I was one of the N1MM
> Logger team members testing our code to ensure we got the scoring to work
> properly, and we had a few email exchanges with the ARRL folks before
> releasing the RRRTTY code.
>
> Strictly speaking, you - as a non-Rookie - could have run more than 100
> watts. The 100 watt limitation is listed as 3.1.2, beneath "Single
> Operator,
> Rookie." There are no power limitations for non-Rookies under section 3.2.
> I
> am not sure if this was intentional or an oversight...
>
> But hey - this was the premier event. We should expect some fine-tuning
> before they get it right; and before we understand how to meet&greet other
> hams we encounter during the event. I certainly support the notion of a
> shallow-immersion contest for RTTY Rookies with old-timers as mentors.
>
> Send some gentle suggestions to Sean (KX9X). I know he listens.
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|