This particular exchange can happen by mistake (operator error) when using
N1MM. I haven't used other contest programs to determine if it's possible
that this error could occur in other programs.
TEST IW1AYD IW1AYD CQ
.....))) IW1AYD 599 070 070 XX#YYY (((....
XX#YYY 599 102 102
.....))) IW1AYD TU HNY DE XX#YYY QRZ (((...
Not to say someone couldn't do it on purpose, but it's possible it's an
accident. The same can occur, again because of operator error...
TEST IW1AYD IW1AYD CQ
.....))) XX#YYY XX#YYY (((....
.....))) IW1AYD 599 070 070 XX#YYY (((....
.....))) XX#YYY XX#YYY (((.... <----- Mistake when I should have sent
the next line.
XX#YYY 599 102 102
.....))) IW1AYD TU HNY DE XX#YYY QRZ (((...
I usually take the initial example above as operator error and not
malicious behavior. I've made the mistake enough that to me it's an
accident.
K2DSL - David
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:16 PM, iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
wrote:
> HI Jeff,
> you wrote down somewhat I couldn't have written in my already log mail,
> well done.
> What I could say Jef. Us TAIL END CQ are here to suffer the same
> inflictions from very one other in the world ... :-)
> It's a pity that some times this is happening. I need a positive
> recognition of UR call.
> UR call is the one just at the left of CQ ... even if you forget the space
> after ...
>
> W7RN TU IW1AYD CQIUTYWWSOMENOISE
>
> I wouldn't not be a multiplier for anybody, I know, but it's clever to me
> - listen: the moon, the sun, the mom.
>
> This same kind of "theft attempt" could be seen here here, not so often,
> and it's coming from the nearby East usually.
>
> But often also who come with the call in and the exchange in the same
> first step make the wrong end.
> As they jump a step over and when I answer they have no more to say ...
> usually what they transmit is what I should have transmitted
>
> TEST IW1AYD IW1AYD CQ
> .....))) IW1AYD 599 070 070 XX#YYY (((....
> XX#YYY 599 102 102
> .....))) IW1AYD TU HNY DE XX#YYY QRZ (((...
>
> Unbelievable: him is stooling not my correnpondant but the QRG where I was
> CQing on.
> Usually I think him understand this his false step, but just to be sure
> better to fire quickly a:
>
> TEST IW1AYD IW1AYD CQ
>
> We had born to suffer ... <:-) ... not only our two Jeff. But also your
> KB# and my XX# are in tribulations, you know.
>
> 73 de iw1ayd Salvo
>
> On 05/01/2015 19:23, Jeff Stai wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:43 AM, David Levine <david@levinecentral.com
>> <mailto:david@levinecentral.com>> wrote:
>>
>> So I (S&P'er) and they
>> (RUN) stations need to wait or, as the contest runs on, I just
>> send my call
>> anyway.
>>
>>
>> Well, OK, but as a religious applier of the CQ at the end, I'd really
>> appreciate it if people would pay attention to it:
>>
>> ...
>> P5ABC 599 NV NV
>> W7RN 599 123 123 P5ABC
>> P5ABC TU W7RN CQ
>> P5ABC P5ABC DE KB0XXX KB0XXX KB0XXX!!!!!
>>
>> Exclamation marks added by me for emphasis. "KB0" prefix shown because of
>> a particular KB0 exhibiting this behavior who would NOT stand by while I
>> was trying to get a fill from a multiplier station who called me. Actually,
>> that particular exchange was more like:
>>
>> ...
>> P5ABC 599 NV NV
>> W7RN 599 $^&*^(*&)
>> P5ABC 599 NV NV
>> P5ABC P5ABC DE KB0XXX KB0XXX KB0XXX!!!!!
>> KB0 PSE STAND BY P5ABC 599 NV NV NR? NR?
>> P5ABC P5ABC DE KB0XXX KB0XXX KB0XXX!!!!!
>> ...and so on...
>>
>> Someone who threw tantrums to get his way as a child no doubt...
>>
>> No intention to cast aspersions on all of the honest law abiding KB0s out
>> there, either. End of rant.
>>
>> 73 jeff wk6i
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com <mailto:wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
>> Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
>> Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|