RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY Skimmer

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Skimmer
From: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:47:05 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
maybe there could be on “word” that the consensus agrees on to use at the end, 
and that word could be eliminated from the ini file ?????

> On 3/24/2016 12:14:18 PM, Alex, VE3NEA (alshovk@dxatlas.com) wrote:
> > RTTY Skimmer Server treats all CQ words listed in the Contests.ini file 
> > equally. For example, for the BARTG contest these 
> keywords are: CQ, TEST, BARTG, BG, QRZ. Replacing one of these keywords with 
> another in your message will not improve the 
> accuracy in any way.
> 
> 73 Alex VE3NEA
> 
> 
> 
> On 2016-03-24 11:53, Don AA5AU wrote:
> > Good points except that RTTY contesters have been adding CQ at the end of 
> > their CQ messages for many years now and it's more the norm now than not. I 
> > wouldn't be against adding QRZ at the end instead of CQ. The point is that 
> > someone tuning across a signal sees someone callsign once or twice and you 
> > don't know if that station is calling someone or calling CQ. By placing CQ 
> > (or QRZ) at the end, you know right away what's going and no need to wait 
> > and continue listening (time wasted).
> > Since Alex has weighed in that adding an extra space at the end does will 
> > not significantly impact the error rate, the question is now...
> > Does adding QRZ instead of CQ at the end of a message reduce the error rate?
> > Don AA5AU
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 
> 
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>