RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum

To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum
From: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:05:15 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
In using GRitty a bit recently I became very impressed by its ability to
decode multiple nearby signals simultaneously. This is tremendous during
S&P and could reduce the need for running station to add an "I'm running"
suffix, since chances are the S&Ping station can tell who is running as
long as the last QSO was within his passband.

It seems like a must-have feature for any RTTY op spending time doing S&P.

73,
Matt NQ6N



On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV <lists@subich.com> wrote:

>
> On 3/27/2016 2:35 PM, Sam Leslie - W4PK wrote:
> > What about CR/LF after the CQ?
>
> Ed answered that question ... you don't want your call jumping a line
> just when the S&P station is about to click on it.
>
> The proper thing is for the S&P caller to start his response with
> CR/LF to put his call at the left edge of a new line clear of any
> garble/noise that may happen between the end of the CQ and his
> transmission.  Starting a call with CR/LF makes things easier for
> the human operators as well as the software (skimmer).
>
> 73,
>
>    ... Joe, W4TV
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>