RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint

To: Al Hanzl <alhanzl@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint
From: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 11:11:38 -0500
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Have you ever operated field day? I swear those guys think that “PLEASE COPY” 
is a FCC or ARRL required part of the exchange. I’ve seen this in CW and RTTY 
too, not just phone!

Tim N3QE

> On Jan 29, 2018, at 10:55 AM, Al Hanzl <alhanzl@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> I agree that the 5NN in CW helps me with receiving the exchange that follows. 
> 
> I realize that many contests do not require the signal report, but 
> fundamentally, isn't an exchange of signal reports required for a valid 
> Amateur Radio contact?
> There must be something in the FCC rules or ARRL guidelines regarding this 
> basic exchange. 
> Al
> K2AL 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Jan 29, 2018, at 10:16 AM, Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> At one point when mode reporting on cards was not so reliable, the DXCC
>> card checkers had some rules of thumb, like 59 indicated a phone contact
>> and 599 indicated a CW contact.
>> 
>> I think we've moved way beyond that era, the few awards I knew of that that
>> required QSL cards with honest RST's on them a few years ago, they no
>> longer require RST's.
>> 
>> Some of the better modern RTTY decoders can use the otherwise meaningless
>> but very common "599" sequence as a way of "locking" on to a RTTY signal in
>> the noise.
>> 
>> I know for sure on CW that I've heard 5NN enough that it helps my brain
>> synchronize and get ready for the real exchange that follows.
>> 
>> Tim N3QE
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>