TRLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Trlog] 1B67LAX Bug

To: Jimmy Weierich <kg2au@stny.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [Trlog] 1B67LAX Bug
From: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 10:57:57 -0600
List-post: <mailto:trlog@contesting.com>
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:29:28AM -0500, Jimmy Weierich wrote:
> 
> U88SF is a busted call.  The correct call is KC6AWX.
> 
> Here's the line from my log:
> 
>  10SSB 16-Nov-02 21:26   22  U88SF           12  U 88 Sf            Sf      
>  2
> 
> BTW, I don't remember what was in the exchange field at the time, 
> but I don't see any single digit serial numbers here.

My guess is that you had U88SF as a string in the exchange field.

That does look like a callsign.

The parser is only so smart and sometimes given some 
data string it does not do what you want it to do it
just does what you tell it to do.


> I knew this had happened at the time, but had no idea what the call 
> should be.  I could have deleted the QSO, but that would have 
> penalized the other operator for my error.

Yes - I have been there before.


> Saving what is in the callsign field before replacing it and allowing 
> it to be recovered with a CTRL-key combination seems like a simple 
> enough solution.
> 

That does sound like a good idea.

> I don't understand why there is such resistance to fixing this!

I do not see huge resistance.  This part of the program has been 
like this for a long long time - I am guessing that no changes 
have been made in the SS exchange parser for more than five years.
As I recall the last time it was worked on Tree made it much
more robust and made it work for many more combinations.

It is not a trivial thing to attempt to parse the contents of
the exchange window - it is one of the more amazing and cool
parts of the program and when you are logging guys in the SS
at 150+ an hour it is really cool that you can just add the 
corrections on the to end of the current exchange field and 
have the right things happen.  But you do (at least I do) have
to think a bit about what I enter so that I do not get 
strange results.  Over time the things that I know work
correctlly everytime have become second nature to me and I 
do not have to spend too many cycles thinking abut what I need to type.

But that go back feature is a good idea.


-- 
George Fremin III - K5TR
geoiii@kkn.net
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr


_______________________________________________
Trlog mailing list
Trlog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>