I have never had that level of success with any version of windows on
any machine. The most reliable system I have used is whatever it is that
is running at the office. We have a systems administrator that keeps it
going. Perhaps if I was a "computer guru" or wanted to become one, I
could get windows on my home machine to be equally reliable. I think the
point is that most people would like a system to be reliable right from
the start. In other words the default settings should result in a system
that does not periodically crash for no apparent reason. I have not
found that to be the case with windows. Therefore I consider computers
running windows to be curious toys rather than serious tools. I will not
own a radio that depends on windows to use it. ...Yes it is only a
hobby, and it could be argued that my radios are just toys too.
Nevertheless I want my radio to be more reliable than I have experienced
window to be.
Ken N6KB
Joe Malloy wrote:
>>They'll get this worked out.Since 1996, it's only
>>gone down a few of times and then only because
>>the UPS ran out of juice before the power company
>>got things going again. It's never failed as a result
>>of software/hardware problems.
>>
>>
>
>Neither has any copy of Windows NT 3.5, NT4.0 and XP that I've been
>running -- either on the home network (5 machines) or as a member of my
>college. (Heck, even Windows with DOS ran very reliably for me!) It's the
>power company that keeps me from having uptimes greater than 150 days...but
>it's up at least between power failures crunching numbers for the Seti@home
>project.
>
>
>
>>This is how mature
>>equipment should behave. Mr. Gates? Mr. Gates?
>>are you awake?
>>
>>
>
>Bob? Bob? Are *you* awake? :)
>
>73,
>
>Joe, W2RBA
>
>P.S. I don't like Billy Boy one bit (!) nor the company he owns and I've
>been investigating Linux for an eventual transition (if only it had the
>support that is there for Windows!).
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
>
|