TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion noise blanker

To: Carl Moreschi <n4py@earthlink.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion noise blanker
From: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:38:57 -0800
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Carl:

Does the Orion's NB unblank the noise in the presence of a signal outside but near the passband of the rx (every NB I've had does this)? i.e. When listening to a CW signal, say, under pulse noise conditions, and there are no other sigs present on the band, the blanker is totally effective; but if another signal is present, in or close to the passband, the nearby sig modulates the noise when the NB is on?

Best,
va7vv

----- Original Message ----- From: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion noise blanker


I agree, the Orion hardware noise blanker is the best I have seen.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
Franklinton, North Carolina
n4py@earthlink.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "K Van Horn" <k7ec@sbcglobal.net>
To: <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"
<tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion noise blanker


The Hardware NB on the Orion is Excellent!! The DSP blanker is effective,
but not as good as the Hardware Blankr!!

The HW NB on Orion is better than the Omni 6+ NB here.

Regards,

Kirby, K7EC

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerry Volpe" <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion noise blanker


> The Orion is still on my 'possible' new rig list and I am very curious
> about its noise blanker functionality.
>
> I live in a very troublesome location for electrical and pulse > generated
> noise. There have been times when I have had to deal with a solid
> blanket of noise from 3 to 300 MHz. Fortunately after several years > work
> and complaints PG&E has repaired a number of my noise sources. However,
> during this process I discovered the value of a good discrete component
> (IF) noise blanker.
>
> I owned a Jupiter and I still have an RX-350 which both supposedly had
> noise blankers, however both were totally useless to me. The noise
> reduction functionality helped somewhat but overall I had to rely on my
> 23 year old Omni-C which had a noise blanker that 'worked' for me. > Under
> typical situations it could knock the noise from 20 dB over 9 to S-4.
> Eventually I gave up on the Jupiter and traded it for an Omni-VI+ which
> has a supperb noise blanker. Then I added a Paragon which had a very
> effective noise blanker as well but not equal to the Omni-VI+. Why even
> my two Scouts have noise blankers that function nicely. Sooooooo what
> about the Orion? does it have two noise blankers? One in DSP and one in
> the IF itself?
>
> My noise here is typical of electrical arc sources. Sometimes the > pulses
> are fairly spaced out so that even though they sound just as broadband
> even my TD-940S noise blanker does a great job.... other times that
> noise is so intense that even my best noise blanker is only able to
> marginally impact it.
>
> So, Orion owners... I am not asking how you would re-engineer the
> Orion... just do you have noise issues at your location and if you do
> how effective do you find the Orion in dealing with it?
>
> 73,
> Jerry, KG6TT
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>