TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 1254 Receiver selectivity: crystal or Q-Multiplier?

To: <wb2vuf@qsl.net>,"Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 1254 Receiver selectivity: crystal or Q-Multiplier?
From: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Reply-to: Steve Baron - KB3MM <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:29:15 -0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
What is a 1254 ?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bwana Bob" <wb2vuf@qsl.net>
To: "Ten Tec" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 22:52
Subject: [TenTec] 1254 Receiver selectivity: crystal or Q-Multiplier?


> I would like to improve the SSB/CW selectivity of my 1254 receiver.
> 455 kHz filters narrower than 4 kHz are very expensive. I thought of
> trying to make a filter out of 455 kHz ceramic resonators, but then I
> started thinking back to my Novice days and the Q-Multiplier. Has anyone
> seen a schematic of a solid-state I.F. Q-Multiplier. It certainly would
> be easy to connect, because it would shunt the second mixer output , so
> I wouldn't have to cut into the I.F. chain. I want to avoid cutting the
PCB.
>
> BTW, the 1254 is a very nice receiver, stable, sensitive, built like a
> tank with its steel case, and it doesn't overload.
>
>
>
> 73,
>
>
> Bob WB2VUF
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [TenTec] 1254 Receiver selectivity: crystal or Q-Multiplier?, Steve Baron - KB3MM <=