| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Arrl and code |
| From: | w8au@sssnet.com |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:08:53 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
At 08:10 PM 12/16/06, george fritkin wrote: It is in the interest of the ARRL to have as many hams as possible. Membership is a numbers game and ADS pay the bills. No code = more hams...I rest my case. Nice theory, but not foolproof. The no-code license from 1992 on raised the number of new hams, but did not correspondingly increase ARRL membership. What you achieve easily does not maintain loyalty or promote serious interest, generally speaking.... Perry w8au |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Arrl and code, Dave Heil |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Arrl and code, george fritkin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Arrl and code, george fritkin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Arrl and code, george fritkin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |