TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey
From: "Gary D Krause" <n7hts@bresnan.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:27:36 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I'm wondering how accurate this survey will be. After all, they are pretty much focused on the Ten Tec crowd. If I didn't own a Ten Tec or even cared about them, I wouldn't have visited their web site to begin with. The only reason I found out about the survey is because, I follow this reflect and I'm also thinking about buying a new rig. :-) However, with all the talk about problems with software updates, it gives me cause to pause. It's good that these issues will be addressed next.

A couple of years ago, I bought a new Argonaut V. I also have a Century 22 that I bought in the 80's. I had the Argo for about eight months and then sold it. The reason was that I didn't care for the DSP and the fan noise among other things. I have more fun with the Century 22 and I like the filtering as well as the adjustable RF gain. The point that I'm trying to make is that it is a simple radio. It isn't run by software, and doesn't have the computer type glitches that are often reported. No menus either. I'm not an old guy that started with the old boat anchors and I have nothing against computer controlled radios. I like bells, whistles, lights and shiny things just like anyone else. I'm just wondering if there isn't room for both? I just added this comment to perhaps give Ten Tec another perspective that the survey doesn't.

Gary, N7HTS







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>