TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OT Kind of. ?? about wide band antennas

To: geraldj@weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT Kind of. ?? about wide band antennas
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:06:12 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
My research into this, including cage dipoles, suggests one may realize little practical tangible effect on SWR bandwidth when replacing a heavy wire antenna element with a small aluminum tube (where "small" = 1-2 inches in diameter.) Theoretically (I believe) it would have more impact on higher frequencies a the size of the element increases relative to wavelength.

There is some discussion of this in the ARRL Antenna Handbook. See page 9-4 and 2-3, et. seq. where it discussed the impact of larger diameter elements on impedance.

Hope that points in a useful direction.

Happy Trails.
=======================  Richards / K8JHR  =========================

On 2/3/2011 5:30 PM, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson wrote:
That slow change of the resistive component and rapid change of the
reactive component is much more prominent if you look at the parallel
admittance than the series impedance.

73

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>