To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] SLIGHTLY OT |
From: | Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:42:47 +0100 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
By the way, TLW predicts nearly 3dB loss in 110ft of 600 Ohm line on 160m with that length dipole; the loss would be even greater with commercial ladderline. My first move would be to lengthen the dipole even if it means "dog legs". I would aim for a minimum of 200ft on 160m. 73, Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] SLIGHTLY OT, ROD |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] SLIGHTLY OT, Art Trampler |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] SLIGHTLY OT, Steve Hunt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] SLIGHTLY OT, Mike Bryce |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |