TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] SLIGHTLY OT

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] SLIGHTLY OT
From: "Walt Amos" <waltk8cv4612amos@att.net>
Reply-to: Walt Amos <waltk8cv4612amos@att.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:35:32 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
WOW ........... you got to be KIDDING, eh?

320 X 1, my golden eagle CB watt meter doesn't even read that high! :-)

Walt K8CV Royal Oak, MI.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Hunt" <steve@karinya.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] SLIGHTLY OT


Mike,

You're putting words in my mouth - I've not said anything about whether
an antenna is "half decent" or not.

What I can tell you for sure is that a 132ft dipole at 50ft above
average ground will have a feedpoint impedance of around 10-j1059 Ohms
at 1.9MHz; and that load will result in 6.5dB loss in 100ft of Wireman
551 if it's dry, and 9dB if it's wet. I leave you to judge whether or
not that constitutes a "half decent" antenna for that band.

Why are the losses so high? Because that feedpoint impedance produces a
VSWR of 320:1 on the 400 Ohm 551 ladderline.

73,
Steve G3TXQ



On 08/04/2011 21:56, Mike Bryce wrote:
Okay...

So what I just read from the link you sent, if I take and put up a center fed Zepp with 66 feet on each side, fed with 450 open line and assume no loss from the tuner or balun that antenna won't make a even halfway decent multiband antenna?


Mike

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>