| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] RX366 |
| From: | Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 20 May 2013 22:45:16 +0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:07 PM, <Rsoifer@aol.com> wrote: > Do you need the RX366? If you are a serious contester, or if you have an > active ham next door, then probably yes. If not, then the stock unit is > probably good enough, especially if you do any listening outside the ham > bands. > > Did I get it right? If you want to be able to depend on the subreceiver not folding in the presence of strong signals on the band (especially cw), you'd want the RX-366. This doesn't necessarily mean contesting. 73, Barry N1EU |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] RX366, Rsoifer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] RX366, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] RX366, Rsoifer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] RX366, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |