TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] RX366

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RX366
From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 22:45:16 +0000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:07 PM,  <Rsoifer@aol.com> wrote:

> Do you need the RX366?  If you are a serious contester, or if you have  an
> active ham next door, then probably yes.  If not, then the stock unit is
> probably good enough, especially if you do any listening outside the ham
> bands.
>
> Did I get it right?

If you want to be able to depend on the subreceiver not folding in the
presence of strong signals on the band (especially cw), you'd want the
RX-366.  This doesn't necessarily mean contesting.

73, Barry N1EU
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>