TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology
From: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 10:36:24 -0800
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I certainly got everyone riled up with this one, didn't I?

Just to be clear, these guys were not giving me grief but I still don't like 
being the guy who is off frequency all the time even though I often run old, 
old gear. The Corsair (I) is not a candidate as a National Bureau of Standards 
reference.

And yes, even modern stuff can be wrong and drift. I will say though that my 
OMNI VII seems to be remarkably better than my Paragon II so at least Ten-Tec 
seems to be serious about getting it on the money.

For the hell of it, one of the guys built a GPS frequency standard set up that 
he somehow feeds into his home brew transceivers. He's a good one to use as in 
zero-beat to me. Once upon a time I understood how this works but can't 
remember.

It all gets more interesting when running old separates that drift and don't 
transceive. The damned 100V drifts so much from cold (unlike say Collins) that 
I just feed the final carrier signal to a bench frequency counter. There is a 
nice test point on the 100V that made it easy. If I hit "Carrier", its version 
of SPOT, I get a readout which I'd venture is more accurate than your average 
monkey. This is easier than zero beating every whip-snitch.

And yes, I actually do believe being on frequency is better than being off.

Sorry to push all those hot buttons.

Jon





_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>