TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OT: Rob Sherwood's impression of the FLEX 6x00

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: Rob Sherwood's impression of the FLEX 6x00
From: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 08:45:48 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Good post, Rick.  Your statement about speculation here matches mine.

So...

My friend is looking for a "station monitor" - he wants an old Kenwood model, but said he would take a good shape Heathkit model if necessary.



        So...   what is the current day cheapest,
        yet effective, station monitor one could use.

        And what would he do with data that suggests
        his station is transmitting wider than it
        should?


Maybe an SDR dongle or FiFi-SDR type unit with good software showing high resolution and a sound card with high sampling rates? Or maybe one of those inexpensive (sometimes free) software oscilloscopes? Or a USB-based oscilloscope? Or should one bite for a 100MHz Rigol or Tektronix type scopes?

Or is some OTHER device more suited to the task?

A friend came over with a $40,000 device that produces a tone and is supposed to scope out what it sees, hears, etc., to test whether or not my old Kenwood R-2000 receiver tunes on frequency or is the display off. Unfortunately, I don't think he was working it right, even though he gave it a clean bill of health. But, I certainly cannot afford one of those in any case!

So... what would the well-intentioned, yet moderately impecunious ham DO in this case?

AND... what would he DO in case it appeared his station was shooting wide of the mark?

======================  K8JHR  ======================



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>