TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] (no subject)

To: "TenTec@contesting.com" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] (no subject)
From: P C A <xtraham58@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 12:38:43 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Most contests use 100 watts as the break point between low pwr and high pwr. So 
why the 200 w???

>
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/7/2014 2:53 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
> > James, I agreed with everything up until the 200w PA.
> > What's the reasoning for 200w?  Because Yaesu does it?  Me too?
> > Now days most linears run legal power with just 40w input.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>               Exactly.  You gotta offer something
>               different or you are the same.  Remember the
>               TS-990 has a 200 watt output, also.
> 
>               IT DOES NOT HAVE TO MAKE SENSE... IT ONLY
>               HAS TO SELL.
> 
>               Loads of guys like the idea of a 200 watt
>               rig.  It does not have to make sense, and
>               if they think they won't need an amp, or
>               if they think they will be more manly
>               with a bigger rig, then ...  get it?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > There are a lot of peripherals on the market that were designed for 100w and
> > will fail if hit with 200w.
> > I don't see any benefit in that.
> 
> 
> 
>               You are not buy anything, so why vote?
> 
>               Now, I am not being rude or snotty, but
>               simply pointing out that guys like you
>               are not the driving force in the marketplace
>               and you won't be buying it anyway, because
>               it does not fit your operating style or
>               budget or several other considerations, so
>               I am directing the rig to other guys with
>               money to burn, and who might operate differently,
>               and who might think a 200 watt PA is a good plan.
> 
>               Again, not being personal about you in particular,
>               but simply saying I think the there is a market
>               for this sort of thing, provided it comes at a
>               reasonable cost.
> 
>               Sheesh... just consider how many guys have purchased
>               Yaesu rigs with higher power, and how many guys have
>               purchased a TS-590 with a 200 watt output - now you
>               would not spend extra for that... but I think a lot
>               of other guys would.
> 
> 
>               An analogy:   I think most of the crap they sell
>               in the Five and Dime Stores and the Dollar Stores
>               is cheap crap and a waste of money.  But they
>               are still in business, so they must be making
>               money SELLING CHEAP CRAP ... so I the point
>               is to know your audience ... sell what sells.  It
>               does not have to make sense... it only has to sell.
> 
>               
> 
> 
> 
> > But my vote is for the spec to remain 100w and the radio to only be drivable
> > up to that power level.
> 
> 
> 
>               That's cool.  But what would sell more radios
>               at a workable cost for buyer and seller, alike?
>               That is the magic question!
> 
> 
> 
>       No argument with your technology... just thinking TT
>       could sell more radios if it offers something more or
>       different at a lower price point - and just ruminating
>       on how they can do that.    Simply a marketing thing, not
>       a technical thing, I am talking about.
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------  K8JHR -----------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> /
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
                                          
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>