TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group
From: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:50:54 +0200
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Jim,

In about 2010 the ARRL tested 3 remote tuners.
I could never find that test.  Searched on and off for years.
Finally found it a couple of months ago and began updating my Excel file
with this data, but haven't finished.

Right now I am spending every spare minute out in the field measuring and
testing new antenna designs, and not working on my web site.  It will
probably  be October or November before I get back to focusing on my web.

I am on vacation, wine tasting, in Bingen on the Rhein.  I do not have the
information with me.  When I'm home, I'll try to remember to hunt out which
issue of QST that was in and post it here.

I'll be home tomorrow night.

73
Rick, DJ0IP

-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Allen
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 3:31 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group

Has anyone done similar testing on the autotuners or remote autotuners?

73 de W6OGC Jim Allen 

Sent from my iPad

> On Jul 18, 2016, at 00:48, rick@dj0ip.de <Rick@dj0ip.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> OR... simply read the ARRL test report where the ARRL shows several 
> balanced matchboxes and their matching ranges, including the JVM.
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>